Monday, February 22, 2010
Jill's Final Presentation
Danielle's Final Presentation
Matt's Final Presentation
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Works Cited
"Equal Pay Act (1963)." American History. ABC-CLIO, 2010. Web. 31 Jan. 2010.
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. "Turned." Scribbling Women. Ed. Elaine Showalter. New Jersey: New Brunswick, 1996. 367-376. Print.
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins, "Women and Econmics." The American Reader. Ed. Diane Ravitch. New York: New York, 2000. 354-356. Print.
Graff, Evelyn Murphy and E.J. "Women Still Earn Less Than Men Because of Sex Discrimination." Opposing Viewpoints: Working Women. Ed. Christina Fisanick. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2008. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Deerfield High School. 8 Feb. 2010.
Graham, Sara Hunter, Woman Suffrage and the New Democracy, 1996; Spruill Wheeler, Marjorie, One Woman, One Vote: Rediscovering the Woman Suffrage Movement, 1995.
Mansbridge, Jane J., Why We Lost the ERA, 1986; McGlen, Nancy E., and Karen O'Connor. Women's Rights: The Struggle for Equality in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. New York: Praeger, 1983; Shipley, Amy, "Playing Field Levels at Texas," The Washington Post, July 7, 1997.
Perry, Joellen. "She's a money player now.(Heather Sue Mercer wins sexual discrimination case against Duke University)." U.S. News & World Report. 129. 16 (Oct 23, 2000): 18. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Deerfield High School. 8 Feb. 2010.
Rampell, Catherine. "Women Now a Majority in American Workplaces." NYTimes.com. The New York Times. 5 Feb 2010. Web. 8 Feb 2010.
"Women Are the Victims of Sexism." Opposing Viewpoints: Feminism. Jennifer A. Hurley. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2001. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Deerfield High School. 5 Feb. 2010 .
Pictures and Youtube:
http://www.bakersfieldcollege.edu/jstratton/images/rosie_riveter.jpg
http://www.bp.blogspot.com/_Scr9xDXOiX8/SwRmUpdp8KI/XwSJKPqQGaM/s1600/Susan_B_Anthony_Older_Years.png
http://www.brookings.edu/gs/cps/ga/images/kennedy_equalpayact.jpg
http://www.general-anaesthesia.com/images/elizabeth-stanton.jpg
http://www.keebleantbks.co.uk/Bin_Ends/c_p_g.jpg
http://www.ourvoiceourcountry.org/img/timeline/Womens-Liberation-Movement-L.jpg
http://www.womenshistory.about.com/library/graphics/opposed_suffrage.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dPF0SGh_PQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjwn9wOLf5I
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Analytic Entry on Current Events
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Analytic Entry on Literature
After Mrs. Marroner's realization, though, she is able to begin the process of progression. She takes back her anger at Gerta, and instead turns that into a rage against her husband. She is no longer allowing herself to be viewed as more inferior, so she decides to fight back by leaving her home with Gerta. She put her life into her own hands and began to support herself and Gerta on her own instead of relying on the job and decisions of Mr. Marroner. As women began to earn more rights, they became stronger and no longer had to wait at the side of their husbands. Similar to Mrs. Marroner, once she had a solid foundation, she saw the power she could have had all along. It took a painful event to begin changing Mrs. Marroner, but at the end of the book, Mr. Marroner comes back and wants forgiveness. He has finally come to terms with the respect that women deserve. She now had the decision of what to do with their marriage, making her have a much more significant role in her husband's eyes.
Even though Mrs. Marroner blamed Gerta for the affair in the beginning, she was still being blinded by the reliance she had on her husband. Like most women during this time, she believed that having a husband was all that mattered. She soon learned, though, that women do not need a man in order to obtain happiness. By fighting back, and leaving her husband for a new life, she was demonstrating the willpower she had to eventually have a more important role in society.
Analytic Entry on Background
In the nineteenth century, women did not even have the right to vote. No one questioned this until Elizabeth Stanton and Susan B. Anthony became two of the most well-known activists for the women’s suffrage movement. They began to challenge the government after the Fifteenth Amendment was created, giving African American men the right to vote, but not women. The two women felt that, “the amendment merely expanded male suffrage” (Graham). As a result, Stanton and Anthony started the National Woman Suffrage Association (NWSA) in order to try and appeal the Fifteenth Amendment to include women too. Along with this organization, Anthony collected ten thousand signatures from twenty-six states to present to the Senate. To much disbelief, the Senate “responded with laughter” (Graham). This demonstrates that even the government had no respect for women’s rights. They disregarded the effort Anthony had put forward only creating a bigger obstacle for women to overcome. Although it took many decades, women worked to display their power to the government. In 1919, Congress approved an amendment that would guarantee women the right to vote. This finally gave women a voice in the government, and showed their determination to change their role in society.
Even after the major breakthrough of the Nineteenth Amendment, women still had to continue their fight against sex discrimination. The government considered women as second-class citizens, and ignored most of their attempts for equality. However, this perception of women was soon turned around during World War II. While all the men were busy fighting, it was clear that America would only be able to succeed if they enlisted a large number of women for employment. Women were needed to do the very untraditional jobs such as building planes, tanks, and ships to even have a shot at winning. They proved to be just as capable as men at completing their jobs, however when the men returned home from war, women were forced to give up their jobs. The government viewed women as "a labor reserve that would be used only in times of crisis" (Mansbridge), and wanted them to go back to the jobs they were accustomed. Even though women illustrated the necessary skills to maintain their jobs, the government chose to ignore their efforts. This shows the little authority women had in their own society. They were not trusted with responsibilities that the government believed only men could handle, thus leading them to have little significance within their communities.
The struggle women had in the workplace continued even after Congress enacted the Equal Pay Act in 1963. The act was an amendment to the Fair Labor Standards Act because women were being treated much differently than men when it came to getting paid. The Equal Pay Act allowed women to receive the same amount of money as men for jobs that required equal skill, effort, responsibility, and work conditions. It also made sure than a company could not discriminate against women when hiring someone for a job. Although this seemed like a very positive action towards women's rights, employers worked hard at finding the loopholes in the amendment. What was not correctly defined in the act was the definition of "equal work." Jobs did not have to be identical for them to be considered equal. Because of this, "It did not prevent employers from reclassifying certain types of jobs according to a lower pay scale" (Equal Pay Act). A woman could potentially be doing the same work as a man, but paid less due to the title of the job. This goes to show that women were taken advantage of during this time because of their lack of recognition in the workplace. The skills women had were not valued as much as a man's, so companies wanted to avoid spending more money on paying them.
The lack of respect women received was evident during this time. It took several laws and amendments to give them the equality that they deserved. Through this long process, women were able to advance into a much greater role in society. It took these even, though, to show the rest of the world that women were ready for change.
Monday, February 8, 2010
Women Now a Majority in American Workplaces
In the beginning of this article, it mentioned that men were losing more jobs than women were. It did not give the reason why until later in the article, but my first guess was that it was possibly because women are paid less. Paying women less than men would make them more affordable, and in the time of a recession, that type of cheap labor is exactly what companies are looking for. I thought that this article would be an example that women are in fact still paid less than men, however as I kept reading, it said that it was because the typical jobs of women are safer during the recession than the jobs men have. From what I have learned from past articles, the typical jobs of women are still somewhat low paying jobs. This goes to show the increasing amount of women with jobs because even if they are getting paid less, they are exceeding men in the nation's payrolls.
Rampell, Catherine. "Women Now a Majority in American Workplaces." NYTimes.com. The New York Times. 5 Feb 2010. Web. 8 Feb 2010.
Women Still Earn Less Than Men Because Of Sex Discrimination
Graff, Evelyn Murphy and E.J. "Women Still Earn Less Than Men Because of Sex Discrimination." Opposing Viewpoints: Working Women. Ed. Christina Fisanick. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2008. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Deerfield High School. 8 Feb. 2010
She's A Money Player Now
After starting on her high school team, Mercer wanted to be the first female Division I kicker. As a Duke walk-on, she kicked a 28-yard field goal earning her the opportunity to play on their team. Soon afterward, former head coach Fred Goldsmith banned her from summer training camp and season practice until he made the decision to cut her altogether. He then continued to ask her, "Why do you insist on playing football?" and "Why not try something like beauty pageants?" (She's A Money Player Now). Not only do these type of statements imply sex discrimination, but it also shows men's lack of respect for women in sports. Goldsmith clearly believed that football was a sport for men, and strictly men. He crushed the dream of Mercer, and disregarded her skills in football. Along with that he added in a stereotypical comment about pageants, going back to the idea of women being treated as objects. He did not take her seriously as a player, so he tried to convince her to participate in an activity that he saw as more appropriate for women. I believe this comment is as sexist as can be because of the little value he sees in women. He makes it seem that women are only useful for physical needs, and does not take their opinions and feelings into consideration. However, after a two week trial, Goldsmith got what he deserved. The jury ruled that Duke discriminated against Mercer, and awarded her with two million dollars in punitive damages. Although Duke planned to appeal the jury's decision, the case still had a major impact on the number of women who played on their school's football team.
Duke University could still say that Mercer's skill was not good enough to be on the team. Regardless of that, though, Goldsmith never should have made those remarks referring to Merce's decisiion to play football. It shows that even today, men consider women to be extremely unequal in sports, but how can they know that if they never give women a true opportunity to play? Mercer took a stand against this unfairness, and in the end succeeded. This could only be more motivation to women everywhere to play sports even if they're against the odds.
Perry, Joellen. "She's a money player now.(Heather Sue Mercer wins sexual discrimination case against Duke University)." U.S. News & World Report. 129. 16 (Oct 23, 2000): 18. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Deerfield High School. 8 Feb. 2010
Friday, February 5, 2010
Women Are The Victims of Sexism
The author, Andrea Poe, tries to convince feminists to defy this stereotype, and become even more active in today’s culture. She demonstrated the need for change by explaining how some aspects of our daily lives have still not progressed over time. In the business world, “Some women have found cracks in the glass ceiling, far more have not” (Women Are the Victims of Sexism). The reason for this is because women are not trusted with the jobs of corporate America. Men have little faith in the capabilities of women, showing why only a small amount of them have found those "cracks" in business. With sexism in the workplace, it is no wonder why "Women continue to be the primary engineers of the cooking, cleaning, and the running of time-consuming household chores " (Women Are the Victims of Sexism). Society makes these unwritten rules too difficult to change, therefore making women continue these trends currently, and for years to come. Women also tend to struggle in having a big role in politics. We still have not had a female president, however we have made progression after Hillary Clinton's campaign. Once a woman becomes president, I believe there will be much more respect for women all over the country. That action would show that Americans have begun to make real gains in providing women with equality.
Even though the struggle for equality continues today, Poe believes that "It may be women, more than men, who perpetuate traditional gender roles" (Women Are the Victims of Sexism). This explains that women are in their current position because of their own choices and actions. Poe further discussed this idea by mentioning some of the traditions of the American home-life. On Christmas, parents usually give their daughters dolls, make-up kits, or a kitchen set, which only allows the present gender roles carry on. They get their child the typical gift instead of getting them a soccer ball, or some other gift that may be given to a boy. In this case, society is not having any input in the decision of the parents. They are following the trend of each gender role, and increasing the chance of their children doing the same thing. With this idea in mind, are women really the victims of sexism like the title implies? It seems that even though women keep fight for equality, at the same time they are pushing themselves farther from any real achievement. And in some ways I do believe that it is the women's fault for conforming to the opinions of society. However, there are many more cases that still need to be fought against that make women the victims. I do believe women should be treated fairly in business, especially when it comes to being paid the same amount as a man. Women deserve to have equal opportunities, but that chance can never come without the effort and unity women had in the past.
"Women Are the Victims of Sexism." Opposing Viewpoints: Feminism. Jennifer A. Hurley. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2001. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Deerfield High School. 5 Feb. 2010
Turned by Charlotte Perkins Gilman
Mrs. Marroner's response to the cheating could be considered a solution to women being taken advantage of due to their role in society. She left her own house with Gerta, and took put her life into her own hands. She supported herself instead of relying on the job of her husband, and along with that, she took care of the "sacrificed and injured" child. The way Mrs. Marroner handled her situation is an example of how economic independence would release women from their subordination within marriage. She was able to leave her marriage, which was so important to her, and make a provide a sturdy foundation to start a new life.
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. "Turned." Scribbling Women. Ed. Elaine Showalter. New Jersey: New Brunswick, 1996. 367-376. Print.
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Where I'm At Now
Women and Economics
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins, "Women and Econmics." The American Reader. Ed. Diane Ravitch. New York: New York, 2000. 354-356. Print.
Monday, February 1, 2010
Women's Liberation Movement
No matter how many protests they had or how many new laws were enacted, women could not win the battle for equal rights. In the 1960s and 1970s, women still struggled to break free from their traditional roles in society. Most would view women as objects, and inferior to men in every way. For that reason, the Women's Liberation Movement used the Miss America Pageant to protest male oppression and racism. They viewed the contestants in the pageant to be perfect examples of women being treated at "things." They also fought for the rights of other races because the pageant had discouraged nonwhite contestants from entering. The women tried to prove their point when, "They threw away bras and girdles, tore up an issue of Playboy magazine, and shouted 'Liberation Now!'"(Women's Liberation Movement). By throwing their undergarments away, I believe they were showing their strength in that they weren't just there to look a certain way. They wanted to be noticed for their feelings and opinions, so they were throwing away the objects that enhanced their physical appearance. Along with that, ripping up pictures in the Playboy magazine demonstrates the same idea as women being seen as objects, not humans. It shows women acting a certain way in order to please others-typically men. They were not allowing the ideas of the female be heard, but just being used for their physical attraction. By ripping up the magazine they are making it away that they will not be used for entertainment, but to finally let their voice be heard throughout their whole community. During this time, government hired very few women as professionals. At Universitites, only ten percent of the faculty included women, and although women mainly made up most of the staff at elementary schools, very few were the principal or superitendent.
Berkeley, Kathleen C., The Women's Liberation Movement in America, 1999; Hoff, Mark, Gloria Steinem: The Women's Movement, 1991; McQuiston, Liz, Suffragettes to She-devils: Women's Liberation and Beyond, 1997.
Women's Liberation Movement
Sunday, January 31, 2010
Equal Pay Act
The success women had in the workplace during World War II was only the beginning of their fight against sex discrimination. Employers were still unfair when it came to women working, forcing Congress to pass the Equal Pay Act of 1963. The act was an amendment to the Fair Labor Standards Act because women were being treated severely different than men when it came to getting paid. The Equal Pay Act allowed women to receive the same amount of money as men for jobs that required equal skill, effort, responsibility, and work conditions. It also made sure that an employer could not discriminate against women when hiring someone for a job. Although this seems like a very positive action for women, there are loop holes similar to many solutions of the government. What was not correctly defined in the act was the definition of "equal work." Jobs did not have to be identical for them to be considered equal. Because of this, "It did not prevent employers from reclassifying certain types of jobs according to a lower pay scale" (Sex Discrimination). This demonstrates that a woman could be doing the same work as a man, but because they are not referred to as the same job, a woman could potentially be paid less. Once again, women were being treated similar to blacks in the way they were cheated when being paid for work. Blacks were taken advantage of because they were willing to do difficult labor for a cheap price. Although women were not doing the same physically demanding work as blacks, they were still being treated as if they were worth less than a white man. Reading this article made me gain much more respect for women that are on the higher end of the working scale. Those are the women that were able to defeat the loop holes of this act, and show the true capabilities of a woman. I believe that because this act is still in affect today, it has only caused a greater tragedy. Any person that wants to base someone's salary off their gender does not believe in the power females have. Even though we have laws forbidding discrimination in the workplace, our society continues to find way around this law due to the lack of appreciation there is for women.
"Equal Pay Act (1963)." American History. ABC-CLIO, 2010. Web. 31 Jan. 2010.
Equal Pay Act
Friday, January 29, 2010
Sex Discrimination
Although the Ninteenth Amendment was a major achievement towards women's rights, the fight against sex discrimination was just beginning. The government still believed that women were inferior to men, so in 1922, they passed the Married Women's Independent Citizenship Act. This act made women unable to gain citizenship without a husband. The government treated women as if they were second-class citizens, and ignored most attempts they made at equality. However, this perception of women was turned around during the time of World War II. While all the men were busy fighting, it was clear that America would only be able to win if they enlisted a large number of women for employment. They needed women to do very untraditional jobs such as building planes, tanks, and ships in order to fight in the war. It became the "patriotic duty" of women to go out and work, ultimately making them successful in the workforce, and more powerful within the government during the 20th century. I see this as a very crucial time for women because they were able to experience a sense of social and economic mobility. Women were suddenly faced with choices, and by exercising these choices they were able to explore their own individuality and independence. The government was able to change as well seeing the great impact women could have on the economy. Congress passed the Equal Pay Act of 1963, "mandating that women receive equal pay as men for equal work" (Sex Discrimination). Following this was the Civil Rights Act in 1964. Even though women were gaining more civil rights, there were still political groups trying to prevent them from earning anymore. This forced the creation of the National Organization for Women (NOW). I believe one of the most interesting accomplishments of NOW was that, "It stipulated that every federally funded college and university had to provide equal opportunities for men and women in their varsity sports roughly equal to the proportion of each gender in the school" (Sex Discrimination). Because I play volleyball, I think it's imperative that women and men have the same chances when it comes to sports. Schools often feel that that men's sports are more important, but NOW was able to change that by defying any public or private sports program that targeted women for discrimination. Many of these cases were brought to court where women used the Fourteenth Amendment to prove certain laws as unjustifiable. This technique was used during the Plessy vs. Ferguson case when they tried to prove that the law "separate, but equal" was unreasonable. This further proves the connection between women and blacks. They were both treated as inferior to white men, and frequently had to fight for equality through laws that were unjust.
Mansbridge, Jane J., Why We Lost the ERA, 1986; McGlen, Nancy E., and Karen O'Connor. Women's Rights: The Struggle for Equality in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. New York: Praeger, 1983; Shipley, Amy, "Playing Field Levels at Texas," The Washington Post, July 7, 1997.
Sex Discrimination
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Women Suffrage Movement
Allowing women the right to vote was a major stepping stone in providing equal rights to all women. This was no easy task to accomplish seeing that everyone considered women inferior to men. In 1848, the first women's rights convention took place in Seneca Falls, New York, where Elizabeth Cady Stanton asked the assembly to vote on a resolution demanding suffrage for women. The assembly made no effort to fulfill Staton's request. However, their unappreciation for women's rights only made them want to work harder towards their goal. After the civil war, Stanton continued with her fight along side of Susan B. Anthony. Susan B. Anthony is one of the most well-known women that fought for women's suffrage for more than fifty years. They strived for equal rights, however when the Fifteenth Amendment was created giving African American men the right to vote, Stanton and Anthony, "felt the amendment merely expanded male suffrage." I believe it is extremely unfair to start giving black men more freedoms, but completely ignoring the proposals for women. It shows the male dominance during this era and the little respect men actually had for women. I could only see this obstacle as motivation for women to work hard to gain their rights, and that's exactly what Stanton and Anthony did. They started the National Woman Suffrage Association (NWSA) in order to try and appeal the Fifteenth Amendment to include women, too. Along with this organization, Anthony tried to vote in 1872, but was arrested and found guilty. This reminded me of Rosa Park's attempt at equal rights when she refused to sit in the white section. Women were treated with the similar disrespect as blacks because they were somehow "inferior" to men. Women had to fight for laws that women today often take advantage of. When I reach the age of 18, there is no doubt in my mind that I plan on voting, and would be offended if anyone ever questioned my freedom to vote because I am a women. I could only imagine the unfairness that women had to suffer through in the 19th and 20th century. Anthony refused to conform to the lack of rights for women no matter what the consequences were. She collected 10,000 signatures from 26 states to present to the Senate. To much disbelief, they "responded with laughter." This demonstrates that even the government had no respect for women's rights. The government during this time was clearly biased and only worked against women in fighting for what they believed it. Although it took many decades, women worked to display their power to the government. In 1919, Congress approved an amendment that would guarantee women the right to vote. Without this amendment, the opinions and power of women would still be looked at as inferior to men. Along with this, Stanton and Anthony are perfect examples of the power women do have to change society and the government.
Graham, Sara Hunter, Woman Suffrage and the New Democracy, 1996; Spruill Wheeler, Marjorie, One Woman, One Vote: Rediscovering the Woman Suffrage Movement, 1995.
Women's Suffrage Movement
Women
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Response to Obama's State of the Union Address
Barack Obama's State of the Union Address was said to be defiant, similar to Ronald Regan's address in 1983. He admitted to the many problems with our country's economy, however, he had an optimistic tone when referring to our future. One of the main topics of Obama's address was the job crisis in America. Due to the poor economy, finding a job has been a difficult task for those looking for work. One of his solutions was to export more goods because increasing the amount of productivity would give the opportunity for more jobs in America. During the next five years, Obama plans on doubling exports in order to provide two million jobs across the country. He then continued to discuss the need to help small business owners maintain their jobs. The problem with small businesses is that banks are only willing to lend money to bigger companies. To solve this, Obama proposed that thirty billion dollars from Wall Street banks be given to less significant banks in order to support small businesses. There would also be a tax credit for small businesses to hire new workers or raise their wages. I found this topic to be extremely important seeing that my father owns a small business. I know that he was in favor of Obama's proposal because small businesses employ almost half of all Americans. By allowing smaller businesses to expand, Obama is helping to decrease the problem with America's unemployment rate.
Obama continued by describing our country as every day being election day. Since Americans tend to look for embarrassing headlines about the opposite party, they are not playing to win, but for the other party to lose. We feel the need to obstruct every single bill just because we can. I believe this shows the high level of competition in our society today. The poor economy has brought American citizens to work against each other instead of focusing on improving the conditions of our own country. After Obama discussed topics that I was somewhat unfamiliar with, he touched upon the idea that all men are created equal. He insisted that if you abide by the law, you should be protected by it, too. To further encourage this idea, Obama plans on strengthening laws to protect against those affected by hate crimes. This includes the argument over gay marriage. He agreed on working with congress to allow gay Americans to be married. Obama also mentioned the idea of freezing government spending once the country was done hurting, and also touched on the idea of health care. Regardless of the amount of applause President Obama received after each section of his address, there is no doubt that many disagreed with his ideas. Members of the Supreme Court made it very evident that they opposed some of his solutions by remaining silent as the rest of the administration applauded him. Even though the two parties will not be agreeable on every topic, President Obama seems eager to begin the process of rejuvenation of our country.
Clooney Gets Involved
For more information Clooney's telethon, click here.
How to Help Haiti
World Vision Support